The Risks for European Cohesion in the Russian-Ukrainian crisis
The conflict in Ukraine, triggered by the Russian invasion of 2022, marked the return on a…
Read More »Reality Check: Russian Intentions in Europe
The Trump administration’s decision to initiate peace negotiations with Russia ended exactly as anticipated in Central…
Read More »The Warning Signs We Ignored: How 2021 Telegraphed Putin’s Invasion and What It Means for Future Threats
In December 2021, as President Biden hosted the first Summit for Democracy, declaring America’s commitment to…
Read More »From Plywood to Precision: How German Drones Are Changing Ukraine’s Battlefield Strategy
In an era of hypersonic missiles and AI-powered weapons, Ukraine has found an unlikely advantage in…
Read More »The Department of the Navy’s Science and Technology Board Accelerates the Journey to Achieve a “Hybrid Fleet”
The Navy-After-Next will be a “Hybrid Fleet.” This concept was first articulated by then-Chief of Naval…
Read More »Macron, Trump, and Syria: How the Diplomatic Shift Reshapes Erdogan’s Strategic Calculus
In a remarkable diplomatic shift, both France and the United States have taken significant steps toward…
Read More »
The government is releasing two reviews of the V-22 Osprey in the next few months, and they will undoubtedly generate media attention. Program critics may use the release of these reports as an opportunity to trash the Osprey, but more serious thinkers will put the reports in the proper context. Beyond sensational headlines, the real news is that the military services – with the U.S. Marine Corps in the lead — are successfully embarking upon continuous improvement of an aircraft that is absolutely essential to our military’s concepts of operation, especially in the Indo-Pacific. The Navy is authoring a report on the program, known as a “comprehensive review” of the V-22. Vice Adm. Carl Chebi, commander of Naval Air Systems Command, recently said he is making final edits. It is...